Marriage contracts in Canada are subject to provincial legislation. Every province and territory in Canada recognizes marital agreements. For example, in Ontario, marriage contracts are called marriage contracts and are recognized by Section 52 of the Family Law Act.  In the United States, marriage contracts are recognized in all 50 states and the District of Columbia, and are enforceable if prepared in accordance with state and state requirements. It has been reported that the demand for marriage contracts in the United States has increased in recent years, especially for millennial couples.     In a 2016 survey conducted by the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers (AAML), member lawyers reported that the total number of clients seeking premarital marriage arrangements has increased in recent years, particularly with the Millennial generation, with the greatest interest in protecting capital gains in the case of separate ownership, inheritance and shared ownership.  In California, a couple may waive their participation rights (common property) through a prior contract.  The agreement may limit sp assistance (although a court may set it aside in the event of a divorce if it considers the restriction to be unacceptable). The agreement can be used as a contract to make a will that requires one spouse to take care of the other in the event of death. It may also restrict inheritance law in the event of death, such as the right to inheritance allowance, the right to execution, the right to take as a predetermined heir, etc.
 In California, registered national partners may also enter into a prenup. Post-marriage agreements are treated very differently in California law. Spouses have a fiduciary duty to each other, so pre-marital agreements fall into a particular category of agreements. There is a presumption that the post-parental agreement was obtained by undue influence when a party gains an advantage. Disclosure cannot be abandoned as part of a post-marriage agreement. [Citation required] A marital agreement is different from the historical marriage regime, which was not primarily about the effects of divorce, but on the constitution and maintenance of dynastic families or a divorce regime established by the parties as part of the dissolution of their marriage. In India, marital agreements are very rare and have no laws in force. However, in the face of rising divorce rates, there is a growing interest in them. Some legal experts believe that prenups have no legal sanctity in India. However, in some cases, usually among wealthy citizens, a form of contract is signed. But agreements must be reasonable and not violate existing laws, such as the Hindu Marriage Act.
Indian courts allow for the signing of a settlement protocol during divorces. But no court has yet been asked to impose a prenup.  The marriage agreement in Thailand is signed on the basis of the mutual consent of the man and woman who wish to marry. Under Thai law, a marriage contract is recognized by Thailand`s commercial and civil code. A valid and enforceable Thai pre-marriage obligation requires the law where: Laws passed by states that adopt UPAA/UPMA have some state-to-state deviations, but this framework of laws has certainly made it much easier for lawyers to prepare marital agreements by law for clients by clearly stating the requirements. For example, under Florida law, there is a very significant difference in what is needed to enter into a legally binding marriage agreement compared to a post-marriage agreement in.